Goa Real Estate Body Backs TCP

A standoff over land-use regulation in Goa has escalated into a broader debate on governance, planning transparency and investor confidence, after the state chapter of the Confederation of Real Estate Developers Associations of India (Credai Goa) publicly backed the Town and Country Planning department amid protests outside its office in Panaji. The confrontation centres on Section 39A of the Town and Country Planning Act, a provision that has triggered concern among sections of civil society over land conversion and planning oversight.

Recent demonstrations, including an overnight sit-in led by a local legislator and residents from a coastal village constituency, have intensified scrutiny of how development permissions are processed. In a formal communication, Credai Goa said it was concerned about what it described as disruptive actions targeting a functioning government office. The industry body argued that administrative processes must be allowed to operate without intimidation, particularly when statutory provisions are already under judicial review. Legal experts note that Section 39A has been challenged before the High Court, making it sub judice. In such circumstances, planning scholars say policy disputes are typically resolved through legislative amendment or court interpretation rather than direct administrative pressure.

The episode highlights deeper tensions in Goa’s urban growth trajectory. Rapid tourism-driven expansion, rising second-home demand and infrastructure upgrades have increased pressure on land in coastal and peri-urban areas. Critics of certain planning amendments argue that environmental safeguards and community consultation must remain central to development decisions, especially in ecologically fragile zones. At the same time, industry representatives contend that regulatory certainty is essential for orderly investment. Unverified allegations of procedural bypass, they warn, can unsettle homebuyers and financiers, affecting project timelines and housing supply. Real estate analysts observe that prolonged uncertainty in planning frameworks can raise project risk premiums, indirectly influencing property prices.

Urban planners suggest that the present controversy underscores the need for greater transparency in land-use changes, including digital disclosure of applications, environmental assessments and approval timelines. Such measures, they argue, can reduce mistrust while ensuring that growth aligns with climate resilience goals and infrastructure capacity. Goa’s compact geography and sensitive coastal ecosystems make planning decisions particularly consequential. Conversion of agricultural or orchard land for urban use can alter drainage patterns, increase flood risk and strain civic services if not accompanied by integrated infrastructure planning.

The current dispute, therefore, extends beyond a single statutory clause. It touches on how small but rapidly urbanising states balance economic opportunity with environmental stewardship and community participation. As the legal process unfolds, policy observers say a constructive path forward will require structured dialogue among residents, planners, lawmakers and industry bodies. The outcome may shape not only Goa’s real estate market but also its broader vision for sustainable and inclusive urban development.

Goa Real Estate Body Backs TCP