Mumbai’s long-frozen pagdi housing stock has returned to the political spotlight after the state government announced plans to introduce a new regulatory framework for redeveloping such properties. While the proposal has been positioned as a step towards modernising the city’s ageing housing fabric, it has drawn sharp criticism from opposition leaders who argue it risks displacing long-time residents while favouring developers and landowners.
Pagdi buildings, largely concentrated in south and central Mumbai, operate under a pre-Independence tenancy model. Tenants historically paid a one-time premium to landlords in exchange for near-permanent occupancy at nominal rents. Although the arrangement provided housing stability for generations, redevelopment has remained stalled for decades due to legal disputes and tenant protections under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The state housing department recently described the proposed framework as a “structural reform” that could unlock redevelopment potential and eventually reduce the city’s dependence on the pagdi system. The move is expected to affect thousands of households living in dilapidated buildings that pose safety and sustainability risks. However, a senior opposition leader said the announcement amounted to “policy signalling without safeguards”, warning that redevelopment could become a tool for pushing residents out of high-value neighbourhoods. “Without recognising tenants as legal occupants with enforceable rights, redevelopment will primarily benefit landowners and builders,” the leader said at a press briefing, urging residents to approach the proposal cautiously.
Urban policy experts note that pagdi redevelopment sits at the intersection of housing rights, land economics and urban renewal. While Mumbai urgently needs to retrofit unsafe structures and optimise scarce land, the city also faces the challenge of ensuring inclusive redevelopment. “The real question is who controls redevelopment and how value is shared,” said an urban housing researcher. “If residents receive only equivalent space while land values multiply, the social contract breaks down.” The opposition has also questioned governance clarity, seeking answers on whether redevelopment would be overseen by the housing authority or directly by the state. Past attempts to resolve the issue included provisions that allowed tenants to initiate redevelopment if owners failed to act within a defined timeframe, though those measures remain under judicial review. Beyond housing policy, the debate has taken on electoral overtones ahead of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation elections. Critics argue that announcements on housing reform, welfare schemes and infrastructure are being rolled out without execution roadmaps, adding to public scepticism. For Mumbai, the stakes are high. Pagdi redevelopment offers an opportunity to improve building safety, energy efficiency and liveability in some of the city’s most congested precincts. Yet experts caution that without transparent rules, community consent mechanisms and climate-resilient design standards, redevelopment could deepen inequality rather than resolve it.
As the policy framework takes shape, urban planners say meaningful consultation with residents will be critical to ensuring redevelopment delivers not just new buildings, but a more equitable and sustainable city.
Also Read: Mumbai Launches Slum Cluster Redevelopment Scheme For Large Plots Above 50 Acres
